Unique Study May Result in Largest UF Retrofit Project in North America

The first pilot study of its type ever conducted
for full-scale implementation may result in the
largest ultrafiltration retrofit yet executed in
North America. More importantly, the study
identified a technology to ensure that Manatee
County, Florida, meets some important water quality
goals for its customers.
Manatee County draws and treats raw water from
Lake Manatee, which was created by an earthen dam in
the 1960s. The county’s 54-mgd surface water
treatment system uses conventional chemical
coagulation-sedimentation-filtration treatment
primarily designed to remove color from the raw
surface water.
Lake Manatee is subject to seasonal water quality
fluctuations which have prompted the county to focus
on cyclical taste and odor issues, the increasing
difficulty to comply with limits on finished water
turbidity, and the elevated operation and
maintenance costs required to address these issues.
While the finished water currently complies with all
water quality standards, the likelihood of more
stringent regulatory requirements may require
enhancement of the current treatment process.
Perhaps the most difficult challenge facing the
county is its location in the Southern Water Use
Caution Area. This is designated as an area in which
water resources are or will become critical in the
next 20 years, making it very difficult to obtain
additional withdrawal permits. Therefore, the county
set a water loss goal on any treatment upgrade to 3
percent or less of the total plant flow. Typically,
reverse osmosis (RO) membrane systems lose 15-20
percent to concentrate. As such, various membrane
configurations were explored, including an
innovative approach to minimize treatment losses by
treating the concentrate stream for blending with
the finished water.

The team developed two basic concepts to achieve a
high-water recovery in a membrane application: 1)
utilizing a high‐recovery RO system where the
concentrate volume is reduced, and 2) treating the
RO concentrate for constituents of concern such that
it can be blended with RO permeate.
The needs of the county are challenging, with no
clear-cut solution to meet water quality/regulatory
requirements within the context of water loss
minimization. Finding the best solution required
original research.
Alternatives Investigated
The county had three primary treatment goals:
reduce intermittent turbidity spikes, decrease taste
and odor compounds, and curtail disinfection
by-product formation, each of which must be achieved
with <3 percent water loss.
As the engineer of record for the county, McKim &
Creed conducted a pilot study at the Lake Manatee
Water Treatment Plant to test a wide range of
technologies and improvements to address the
county’s needs and goals. These technologies could
be used as stand-alone solutions or combined to
create a hybrid fix. The concepts originally
targeted for testing included:
• Filter Rehabilitation • Increasing Filter Depth • Biological Contactor • Ultrafiltration (UF) • Low Pressure Reverse Osmosis (LPRO) • Ion Exchange • Biological Filtration • Ozonation

Reiss Engineering provided the pilot units.
Operations and testing were performed by Reiss and
Manatee County.

Shown here are (clockwise from left) ultrafiltration,
strainer and UF cartridge.

Shown here are (clockwise from top left)
LPRO
cartridge filter, LPRO and chemical storage.
After initial research, the team narrowed the
options to seven technologies to be tested in the
study: – Ultrafiltration (UF) – Low Pressure Reverse Osmosis (LPRO) – LPRO concentrate treatment to minimize water loss
via:
• Magnetic Ion Exchange (MIEX)
• MIEX followed by ozonation • Coagulation-UF • Coagulation-UF followed by ozonation • Ozonation
These technologies were performance-tested
relative to the treatment goals. In addition, these
technologies were applied to the treatment of the RO
concentrate stream to reduce treatment losses. The
goal was to blend the treated RO concentrate back
into the finished water stream while improving the
overall finished water quality—a new approach to
reducing water loss and making it the first study of
its type conducted for full-scale implementation of
a concentrate stream that would be treated and
blended into the finished water.
For seven months, the team of McKim & Creed,
Reiss Engineering, and Manatee County conducted the
pilot study at the treatment plant. “We began the
study during the dry season when the county
typically experiences poorer water quality,”
explains Phil Locke, PE, McKim & Creed senior
project manager. “The pilot testing was then
continued through the wet season. This allowed for
several different technologies to be tested, with
varying levels of treatment/chemical addition to see
what impacts these would have with respect to
treating the RO concentrate stream.” Adds Johna Jahn,
EI, McKim & Creed engineer intern, “The study was
designed to pilot advanced technologies in
unconventional configurations.”
Results Studied
Data from the pilot study showed that while each
piloted technology was able to meet at least one of
the treatment goals, none of the options met all the
goals. Ultrafiltration provided highly successful
turbidity reduction, but none of the configurations
reduced total organic carbon (TOC) while operating
within the acceptable water loss conditions. LPRO
resulted in successful constituent removal and
operation but had unacceptable water loss. LPRO with
concentrate treatment using ozone improved taste and
reduced odor, but did not significantly reduce TOC.
Ozonation with BAF was a viable solution for the
taste and odor concerns, but did not significantly
diminish turbidity or TOC.
Recommendation Made
The team then conducted a weighted analysis of
the primary water quality goals with turbidity
weighted heaviest at 60 percent (as it is a
regulatory-related target), 20 percent for taste and odor,
and 20 percent TOC. This analysis, combined with the
results of the pilot study, resulted in the team’s
recommendation to retrofit existing multi-media
filters with ultrafiltation.
“We worked closely with Manatee County during the
pilot study and also during subsequent evaluations
of alternatives for implementation,” says Locke.
“Due to the downturn in the economy that occurred
during the course of this project, the significance
of cost as a factor in the recommendation for
full-scale implementation greatly increased.”
The UF retrofit offers many potential benefits:
• Reliable turbidity barrier under the most
challenging conditions, • Reduction of current chemical costs, • Absolute protozoan barrier, • Utilization of existing infrastructure, • Improved water quality without additional water
treatment losses, • Lowest-cost alternative, • UF manufacturer performance guarantee that ensures
the processed water will have nephelometric
turbidity units (NTU) of less than 0.10 in 95
percent of all samples.
Moving Forward
McKim & Creed is now conducting a Basis of Design
Report that will include an equipment summary,
process and instrumentation diagrams,
constructability reviews, phasing considerations,
permitting requirements, and an implementation
schedule. This report will include a summary of new
equipment required for the UF system, conceptual
layouts of the new equipment, electrical single-line
diagrams, process and instrumentation diagrams,
recommendations for electrical system and back-up
power supply improvements, project phasing
considerations, permitting requirements, project
implementation schedule, etc.
If Manatee County decides to proceed with the
project, it will be the first UF system retrofit in
Florida and the largest such project ever
implemented in North America.
|